Gathered between 2014 and 2017 by Luis de Miranda as part of his PhD project.
THERE IS NOW A BOOK ON ESPRIT DE CORPS PUBLISHED BY Edinburgh University Press, written by Luis de Miranda
From 2014 to 2017, Luis de Miranda conducted his PhD at the University of Edinburgh on the phrase esprit de corps, from a historical, political, philosophical, and comparative perspective. This site is an annex of his dissertation. It mostly offers links to English-language contemporary uses of the signifier ‘esprit de corps’. It is for the most composed of citations from contemporary media. It offers raw material without the analysis and historical genealogy provided in the PhD. If you use data found on this site, thanks for quoting it as a source.
Abstract | Luis de Miranda | The University of Edinburgh
‘Esprit de Corps’: Birth and Evolution of a Polemical Notion
(France, UK, USA; 1721–2017)
This PhD provides the first ever transnational intellectual history of the globalised notion of esprit de corps, disputedly defined as a sometimes beneficial, sometimes detrimental mutual loyalty shared by the members of a group or larger social body.
As a polemical argumentative signifier, ‘esprit de corps’ has played an underestimated role in defining moments of modern Western history, such as the French Revolution, the United States Declaration of Independence, French imperialism, British colonialism, the Dreyfus affair, the World Wars, the rise of administrative nation-states, or the deployment of individualism and corporate capitalism. The birth of the term is evidenced in eighteenth-century France, both in military and political discourse. ‘Esprit de corps’ is shown to be an important matter of political and philosophical debate for major historical agents (d’Alembert, Voltaire, Rousseau, Lord Chesterfield, Bentham, the Founding Fathers, Sieyès, Mirabeau, British MPs, Napoleon, Hegel, Durkheim, Waldeck-Rousseau, de Gaulle, Orwell, Bourdieu, Deleuze), but also for less remembered authors, scientists, officers, politicians, militants, engineers, entrepreneurs, or administrators.
A comparative methodology is proposed, based on the longue durée examination of large corpora of primary sources in French and English, via digitised archives and a focus on explicit mentions of ‘esprit de corps’ in their rhetorical, philosophical, and historical context. The approach is tentatively called ‘histosophy’: the long-term survey of a large issue within a small compass (Walker 1985), the compass being the invariable observed signifier, and the large issue the multifarious relation between universalism and particularism. An interpretation is eventually elaborated to account for the fact that ‘esprit de corps’ is today an incantation of widespread global use, for example in corporate discourse, with laudative essentializing denotations.
‘Every society of human beings, be it a nation, a corporation, or a company, we know will act with a certain secret esprit de corps, or bias towards its own interests, against all mankind; and in a manner more unjust and unfeeling than individuals: and every corporate body, if not controlled, would tyrannize over all the rest. Hence the great difficulties of regulating the lesser bodies, of which the great one, the nation, consists; and of forming a system of government, wherein the different parts may not combine against the rest of the community.’
 Alexander Jardine, ‘Letter III from Portugal to Friends in England’, in Letters from Barbary, France, Spain, Portugal, etc., by an English officer, 2 vols. (London: Cadell, 1788), vol. II, p. 425.